Forgery of Adele Vetlesen's African Itinerary
The Leopard (Jo Nesbø Edition)The Forgery of Adele Vetlesen's African Itinerary is a staged international journey designed to make a missing Norwegian woman appear to have travelled to Africa and postponed her return. By comparing passenger and immigration records with a postcard and hotel signature, Harry Hole and Kaja Solness showed that the woman who travelled under Adele's name was Juliana Verni. Their reconstruction turned what looked like evidence that Adele had gone abroad into evidence that someone had carefully manufactured her disappearance.
The Norwegian trail
Adele Vetlesen, 28, was from Drammen and had been reported missing by her partner in November. A search of Norwegian State Railways records found that she had bought an online ticket from Drammen to Ustaoset for November 7. On that same date, Borgny Stem-Myhre had bought a ticket from Kongsberg to the same mountain area. The matching destination gave investigators a concrete link between two women whose journeys otherwise might have seemed separate.
Other booking records extended the trail into the mountains. Iska Peller's account was charged on November 20 for two beds in each of four mountain-association cabins, spaced about a day's walk apart. The last was Hävasshütte, where the group was recorded as being on November 7, about half a day's walk from Ustaoset. The charge date and the date of the stay are distinct details; together with the matching train destinations, they place the investigation's questions about Adele and Borgny in the same remote region.
Borgny's last known movements sharpened the significance of that route. After leaving the Mono, where a fashion-magazine event had ended between seven and eight in the evening, she told a friend and colleague she was going home to prepare for a photo shoot. Investigators thought she might have gone to a taxi stand, but no nearby driver recognized her in the available photographs or recorded a trip to Sagene. Two Polish construction workers later found her, fully clothed, in a basement after noticing that its iron door's padlock had been forced. Her disappearance after the evening event made the question of who could have intercepted or redirected her movements central to the investigation.
How the African itinerary was staged
A passenger list for Brussels Air showed Adele Vetlesen flying to Kigali on November 25, but no traveller under that name was registered at Kigali's passport control. Harry explained the discrepancy through the use of a false passport issued in Adele's name: the passenger could depart Oslo under that identity, then present her own genuine passport on arrival. Because the immigration checkpoint did not require passengers to show their flight tickets, the mismatch between ticket and passport could pass unnoticed unless investigators compared the records.
The postcard appeared to support the supposed journey, since it had been posted in Kigali on the day Adele was said to have arrived. Its picture undermined that story: it showed Nyiragongo, a volcano in Congo, not Rwanda. Jean Hue also compared its signature with the signature on the guest card completed at the Gorilla Hotel by the woman registered as Adele Vetlesen. The signatures were not by the same person. The postcard's date and location therefore did not authenticate Adele's presence; combined with the image and handwriting, they made the document part of the deception.
Harry inferred that the real Adele was still in Norway when she was forced to write the postcard. He believed another person then carried it to Africa and mailed it there to make it appear that Adele had travelled, met the man of her dreams, and would not return before March. That account of coercion and Adele's whereabouts was an investigative hypothesis, not something the travel documents independently proved. The documents did establish that the apparent itinerary could not safely be read as a record of Adele's own movements.
Juliana Verni and the death in Leipzig
A card issued to Juliana Verni was found at Kigali's airport immigration office. Information obtained through Katrine Bratt indicated that Juliana did not appear on an airline passenger list for travel to Rwanda that day or in any hotel using modern electronic booking. Three days later, however, she appeared on a Rwandair passenger list in Kigali. Harry and Kaja used this mismatch to identify Juliana as the person who had travelled and checked into the Gorilla Hotel under Adele's name, then posted the card written by the real Adele.
Kaja stated that Juliana was found dead in Leipzig three days after returning from Kigali. Harry agreed that Juliana had travelled under Adele's identity, but the two investigators treated the circumstances of her death as evidence of a further accomplice, not as proof of that person's identity: they suspected that she had worked with someone who later killed her to erase traces of their joint crime. The forgery thus pointed beyond a false travel record, toward a collaboration whose connection still had to be established.
The mountain night in retrospect
A later account by Elias Skog adds a disturbing, though not conclusive, dimension to the Hävasshütte connection. Awake in a moonlit night, Elias saw two people beneath the outhouse's roof: a woman facing him and a man behind her, his face hidden. He initially interpreted her movements as dancing and the man's hand over her mouth as an attempt to keep the pair quiet. After reading about the murders, he reconsidered the scene as a possible assault, with the woman struggling to get free and the hand preventing her from calling for help.
Elias's recollection does not identify the woman as Adele or establish exactly what happened. Its importance lies in the change of interpretation: an episode first mistaken for a private sexual encounter could instead have been violence, and it took the later news of the murders to make that possibility legible. Set beside the ticket records and cabin bookings, the memory keeps the mountain journey from resolving into a simple itinerary. The African evidence exposed a false route; the account of Hävasshütte left the actual night, and the people moving through it, under suspicion.